Blog

Allgemein

Albania: Media freedom groups write to authorities over Focus…

Albania: Media freedom groups write to authorities over Focus Media Group obstruction

Alarm raised over non compliance with a recent decision by court in Tirana.

25.08.2025

To:

Ministry of Interior

Ministry of Economy, Culture and Innovation (MEKI)

Ministry of Justice

State Police

Bailiff Service (Zyra e Përmbarimit Shtetëror)

Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA)

People’s Advocate (Ombudsman) (Avokat i Popullit)

 

Subject: Urgent call to enforce court decision and uphold journalistic freedoms

 

Dear Ministers and officials,

 

We, the undersigned press freedom organisations and regional journalist associations express in this open letter our deep concern over the non-execution of court decisions and the ongoing obstruction of journalistic activity at the Tirana premises of Focus Media Group, which includes News24, BalkanWeb, Panorama, Gazeta Shqiptare, and other affiliated outlets.

 

We are alarmed that despite the clear ruling of the Tirana First Instance Court of General Jurisdiction on 12 August 2025 – which partially upheld the request of Focus Media Group and Panorama Group for urgent interim measures to restore access to journalistic equipment and work materials – these orders remain unimplemented. Journalists continue to face restricted access to the building to retrieve their work materials, and military police and the state-owned entity KAYO are actively blocking execution of the court’s order.

 

The court rightly found that the restrictions imposed on journalists’ work during the eviction enforcement – including blocked access to the premises, the cutting of electricity, and the removal of newsroom equipment – were disproportionate. It also ruled that such disputes should be resolved in a way that minimises interference with freedom of expression and journalists’ rights, in line with international the state’s obligation to safeguard freedom of expression. While the court did not rule on the underlying property dispute – which remains under the jurisdiction of the administrative courts – we welcome its focus on the impact of the intervention on journalists’ ability to work, as well as its finding that the manner in which the eviction was handled was contrary to the Albanian Constitution and Article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights.

 

However, alarmingly the court’s binding order to inventory and safeguard or return all professional materials within 48 hours remains unimplemented. This ongoing and clear defiance of a judicial decision undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent for both media freedom and the rule of law in Albania.

 

We therefore urgently call on the relevant state authorities to:

  1. Immediately and fully implement the 12 August decision of the Tirana First Instance Court of General Jurisdiction, ensuring unimpeded access for journalists to their materials and equipment;
  2. Cease all actions that infringe on journalistic freedom, including demands for journalists to hand over their electronic devices in order to access the building to retrieve belongings, which risks undermining source confidentiality;
  3. Ensure accountability for any state or third-party actors which are actively obstructing  lawful enforcement of the court’s decision;
  4. Uphold Albania’s international commitments to protect freedom of expression and the rights of journalists, as part of its EU accession requirements;
  5. Engage transparently with media companies and representatives involved to avoid further escalation and ensure compliance with legal obligations.

 

We note that while News24 has resumed broadcasting from temporary premises (restaurant) during the interim period, this cannot substitute the full restoration of normal journalistic operations with all of the media outlet’s professional equipment and materials.

 

Regardless of the wider property dispute, the use of state force to continue to block media operations without judicial mandate or compliance with due process is incompatible with Albania’s democratic commitments and EU integration ambitions and sends a worrying message.

 

We further express our solidarity with the Chairman of the Association of Journalists of Albania, Isa Myzyraj, and its member, Osman Stafa, as well as with other press freedom defenders and watchdog organisations who have been targeted because of their action in support of the newsrooms of Focus Media Group and Panorama Group.

 

Our organisations, which previously issued a joint statement on this issue, remain ready to support constructive dialogue on the matter and will continue to support the free exercise of journalism in Albania. We urge swift and responsible action by your respective authorities to resolve this situation in line with domestic and international standards.

 

We will continue to monitor the situation closely and look forward to your individual responses.

Signed by:

Media Freedom Rapid Response

  • International Press Institute (IPI)
  • European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  • Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  • Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  • Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)

SafeJournalists Network

  • Association of BH journalists
  • Association of Journalists of Kosovo
  • Association of Macedonian Journalists
  • Croatian Journalists’ Association
  • Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia
  • Trade Union of Media of Montenegro

Data: 25 Gusht 2025

Drejtuar:
Ministrisë së Brendshme
Ministrisë së Ekonomisë, Kulturës dhe Inovacionit (MEKI)
Ministrisë së Drejtësisë
Policisë së Shtetit
Zyra e Përmbarimit Shtetëror
Autoritetit të Mediave Audiovizive (AMA)
Avokatit të Popullit

Lënda: Thirrje urgjente për zbatimin e vendimit gjyqësor dhe mbrojtjen e lirive gazetareske

 

Të nderuar Ministra,

Të nderuar zyrtarë,

Ne, organizatat nënshkruese për lirinë e medias dhe shoqatat rajonale të gazetarëve, shprehim në këtë letër të hapur shqetësimin tonë të thellë për moszbatimin e vendimeve gjyqësore dhe pengesat e vazhdueshme ndaj aktivitetit gazetaresk në ambientet e Focus Media Group në Tiranë, që përfshin News24, BalkanWeb, Panorama, Gazeta Shqiptare dhe media të tjera të lidhura me to.

 

Jemi të alarmuar që, pavarësisht vendimit të qartë të Gjykata e Shkallës së Parë në Tiranë, më 12 gusht 2025, e cila pjesërisht pranoi kërkesën e Focus Media Group dhe Panorama Group për marrjen e masave të përkohshme urgjente me qëllim rivendosjen e aksesit në pajisjet dhe materialet e punës gazetareske, këto urdhra vazhdojnë të mbeten të pazbatuara. Gazetarët vijojnë të përballen me kufizime në hyrjen në ndërtesë për të marrë materialet e tyre të punës, ndërkohë që raportohet se Policia Ushtarake dhe enti shtetëror KAYO po pengojnë aktivisht ekzekutimin e urdhrit të gjykatës.

 

Gjykata me të drejtë konstatoi se kufizimet e vendosura ndaj punës së gazetarëve gjatë ekzekutimit të dëbimit përfshirë bllokimin e hyrjes në ambientet e punës, ndërprerjen e energjisë elektrike dhe largimin e pajisjeve të redaksisë ishin jo proporcionale. Ajo vendosi gjithashtu se mosmarrëveshje të tilla duhet të zgjidhen në një mënyrë që minimizon ndërhyrjen në lirinë e shprehjes dhe të drejtat e gazetarëve, në përputhje me detyrimin e shtetit për të mbrojtur lirinë e shprehjes. Ndërkohë që gjykata nuk dha një vendim mbi çështjen themelore të pronësisë  e cila mbetet nën juridiksionin e gjykatave administrative ne përshëndesim fokusin e saj mbi ndikimin e ndërhyrjes në aftësinë e gazetarëve për të punuar, si dhe konstatimin se mënyra se si u trajtua dëbimi ishte në kundërshtim me Kushtetutën e Shqipërisë dhe nenin 10 të Konventës Evropiane për të Drejtat e Njeriut.

 

Megjithatë, shqetësues është fakti që urdhri detyrues i gjykatës për të inventarizuar dhe për të siguruar ose kthyer të gjitha materialet e punës brenda 48 orëve vazhdon të mbetet i pazbatuar. Ky mosrespektim i hapur dhe i vazhdueshëm i një vendimi gjyqësor minon shtetin e së drejtës dhe vendos një precedent të rrezikshëm si për lirinë e medias, ashtu edhe për sundimin e ligjit në Shqipëri.

 

Prandaj, ne u bëjmë thirrje urgjente autoriteteve shtetërore përkatëse që të:

  • Zbatojnë menjëherë dhe plotësisht vendimin e 12 gushtit të Gjykatës së Shkallës së Parë të Juridiksionit të Përgjithshëm në Tiranë, duke garantuar akses të papenguar për gazetarët në materialet dhe pajisjet e tyre;
  • Ndërpresin çdo veprim që cenon lirinë gazetareske, përfshirë kërkesat ndaj gazetarëve për të dorëzuar pajisjet e tyre elektronike me qëllim hyrjen në ndërtesë për të marrë sendet personale, gjë që rrezikon konfidencialitetin e burimeve;
  • Sigurojnë llogaridhënie për çdo aktor shtetëror ose palë të tretë që pengon aktivisht zbatimin ligjor të vendimit të gjykatës;
  • Respektojnë angazhimet ndërkombëtare të Shqipërisë për mbrojtjen e lirisë së shprehjes dhe të drejtave të gazetarëve, si pjesë e kërkesave për anëtarësimin në BE;
  • Angazhohen në mënyrë transparente me kompanitë mediatike dhe përfaqësuesit e përfshirë, për të shmangur përshkallëzimin e mëtejshëm dhe për të garantuar përmbushjen e detyrimeve ligjore.

 

Vërejmë se, megjithëse News24 ka rifilluar transmetimet nga ambiente të përkohshme (një restorant) gjatë kësaj periudhe të ndërmjetme, kjo nuk mund të zëvendësojë rivendosjen e plotë të funksionimit normal gazetaresk me të gjitha pajisjet dhe materialet profesionale të medias.

 

Pavarësisht mosmarrëveshjes më të gjerë mbi pronësinë, përdorimi i forcës shtetërore për të vazhduar bllokimin e veprimtarisë mediatike pa një mandat gjyqësor ose pa respektimin e procesit të rregullt është i papajtueshëm me angazhimet demokratike të Shqipërisë dhe aspiratat e saj për integrimin në BE, duke dhënë një mesazh shqetësues.

 

Ne shprehim më tej solidaritetin tonë me Kryetarin e Asociacionit të Gazetarëve të Shqipërisë, Isa Myzyraj, dhe anëtarin e saj, Osman Stafa, si dhe me mbrojtësit e tjerë të lirisë së shtypit dhe organizatat monitoruese, të cilët janë vënë në shënjestër dhe janë kërcënuar për shkak të angazhimit të tyre në mbështetje të redaksive të Focus Media Group dhe Panorama Group.

 

Organizatat tona, të cilat më parë kanë publikuar një deklaratë të përbashkët mbi këtë çështje, mbeten të gatshme të mbështesin një dialog konstruktiv dhe do të vazhdojnë të mbështesin ushtrimin e lirë të gazetarisë në Shqipëri. Ne ju bëjmë thirrje autoriteteve tuaja përkatëse të ndërmarrin veprime të shpejta dhe të përgjegjshme për zgjidhjen e kësaj situate, në përputhje me standardet lokale dhe ndërkombëtare.

 

Ne do të vazhdojmë ta ndjekim situatën nga afër dhe presim me interes përgjigjet tuaja.

Nënshkruar:

MFRR:

  • Instituti Ndërkombëtar i Shtypit (IPI)
  • Federata Evropiane e Gazetarëve (EFJ)
  • Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  • Reporterët Pa Kufij (RSF)
  • Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
  • Qendra Evropiane për Lirinë e Shtypit dhe Medias (ECPMF)

SafeJournalists Network

  • Asociacioni i Gazetarëve të BH
  • Asociacioni i Gazetarëve të Kosovës
  • Asociacioni i Gazetarëve të Maqedonisë
  • Shoqata e Gazetarëve Kroatë
  • Shoqata e Pavarur e Gazetarëve të Serbisë
  • Sindikatat e Medias së Malit të Zi

This letter was coordinated by IPI as part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Allgemein

IPI condemns armed attack on Evrensel’s İzmir bureau, calls…

IPI condemns armed attack on Evrensel’s İzmir bureau, calls for urgent investigation

The International Press Institute (IPI) strongly condemns the armed attack on the İzmir bureau of Turkey’s Evrensel newspaper and calls on authorities to ensure the safety of critical media outlets and journalists.

13.08.2025

According to reports, a gunman opened fire on Evrensel’s İzmir office, located in the Alsancak district, in the early hours of August 13. He was reportedly brought to the location by another individual. Seven bullet holes were found in the newspaper’s exterior signboard. No staff members were present at the time of the incident.

 

Police detained one suspect and collected shell casings from the scene. However, Evrensel stated that its representatives were not officially informed by the authorities about the incident.

 

Evrensel, an independent and critical Turkish daily, has long been subjected to judicial harassment, punitive fines by Turkey’s broadcast regulator, and sustained political pressure. In August 2022, the Press Advertising Agency (BİK) permanently revoked Evrensel’s right to receive public advertisements.

 

This latest armed attack is not an isolated incident, but a dangerous escalation in an already hostile climate for independent journalism in Turkey. It comes after a July mob attack on Leman magazine, as well as threats and intimidation targeting prominent dissident voices including journalists Fatih Altaylı and İsmail Arı.

 

Attacks of this nature not only endanger journalists but also aim to silence critical voices through fear. IPI is deeply concerned that the failure to fully investigate and prosecute those behind attacks on the press creates a culture of impunity, encouraging further violence against journalists.

 

We urgently call on Turkish authorities to hold all perpetrators accountable, guarantee the safety of journalists, and uphold Turkey’s obligations to protect press freedom in line with democratic and international standards. IPI stands in solidarity with Evrensel and all journalists in the country who continue to report in the face of threats and violence.

IPI, Evrensel gazetesinin İzmir bürosuna yönelik silahlı saldırı için acil soruşturma talep ediyor

This statement was coordinated by IPI as part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Allgemein

Albania: Urgent answers needed on Focus Media Group blockade…

Albania: Urgent answers needed on Focus Media Group blockade and journalists’ right to work

We, the SafeJournalists Network, partners of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), Reporters Without Borders (RSF), and Albanian media freedom organisations, express shared concern over the police blockade and subsequent events affecting Focus Media Group, News24, BalkanWeb, Panorama, Gazeta Shqiptare, and other affiliated outlets.

12 August 2025

In the early hours of 9 August, State Police surrounded the building in Tirana where these outlets operate, cut the electricity supply, and blocked access for journalists and staff. This halted News24’s on-air broadcasting. According to Focus Media Group, no prior warning of effectively cutting off the broadcasting signal had been provided. 

 

The police action stems from a broader property dispute between the Ministry of Economy, Culture and Innovation (MEKI) and Focus Media Group over leases and procedures. However, the heavy-handed police action has so far been carried out under unclear legal grounds and without due process. In the absence of a published legal basis, judicial and enforcement orders, or clear timeline and next steps, the legality and proportionality of the action remain in serious question.

 

As a result, since 9 August one of Albania’s leading national news broadcasters, News24, has been off air. As of 12 August 2025, there is still no clarity on when broadcasting will resume, nor on the future of the journalists, media workers, and support staff of Focus Media Group. This uncertainty undermines public trust, weakens pluralism, and risks a chilling effect on media freedom.

 

The impact on media workers is immediate and serious. Approximately 230 employees, journalists, media workers, and support staff, now face the risk of unemployment, with many already experiencing delayed salaries and unpaid social security and healthcare contributions. With the building blockaded and operations disrupted, their livelihoods and professional futures are at stake.

 

We therefore jointly call on the Albanian authorities to guarantee journalists’ right to work and safety and: 

  • to provide a full, public explanation of the legal basis, necessity and urgency of the operation on Saturday early morning, 9 August 2025, including its timing, methods, proportionality, and whether less-restrictive alternatives were considered;
  • to lift the police cordon, restore electricity, and allow free, unhindered access to newsrooms and reporting sites, without intimidation or interference; 
  • to protect journalistic materials and infrastructure, refraining from any seizure or damage and ensuring secure access to equipment, archives, and transmission links; 
  • to safeguard labour rights during disruption, coordinating with the Labour Inspectorate so wages and social contributions are paid and temporary premises and continuity arrangements are enabled; 
  • to provide effective legal guarantees by publishing the legal basis and orders, setting out the timeline and conditions for lifting measures, ensuring an accessible avenue to challenge with suspensive effect where applicable, and coordinating with AMA while using the least-restrictive means to maintain continuity of news service; 
  • to investigate any obstruction of journalists and ensure accountability; and to communicate regularly with the public.

 

We meanwhile call on the ownership and management of Focus Media Group:

  • to act with urgency to safeguard employees’ livelihoods and rights, honour all legal and contractual obligations, and secure temporary premises and continuity plans to protect staff and maintain access to information for the public;
  • to engage constructively with authorities to resolve the dispute lawfully and transparently with the least possible disruption to journalistic work and the public’s right to know;
  • to ensure payment of wages and social contributions, safe access to equipment and data, and non-retaliation against staff during this disruption;
  • to provide full transparency on the legal and contractual situation so employees and the public understand the basis of the dispute.

 

This is not merely a contractual dispute. It raises fundamental issues of due process, proportionality, media freedom, and the protection of journalists and media workers. All parties must act swiftly, transparently, and in the public interest to ensure these rights are respected and upheld.

Signed by:

SafeJournalists Network

  • Association of BH journalists
  • Association of Journalists of Kosovo
  • Association of Macedonian Journalists
  • Croatian Journalists’ Association
  • Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia
  • Trade Union of Media of Montenegro

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) Partners

  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  • European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  • ARTICLE 19 Europe
  • International Press Institute (IPI)
  • Free Press Unlimited (FPU)

Civil society organisations in Albania:

  • Center Science and Innovation for Development (SCiDEV)
  • Albanian Media Council (KMSH)
  • Association of Journalists of Albania (AGSH) 
  • Albanian Woman in Audiovisual (AWA)
  • Amfora
  • Association of Professional Journalists of Albania (APJA) 
  • Union of Journalists and Media Workers (SGPM)
  • Albanian Helsinki Committee (AHC)
  • Albanian Center for Quality Journalism (ACQJ)
  • Balkan Investigative Reporting Network Albania (BIRN Albania) 
  • Faktoje 
  • Union of Journalists of Albania (UGSH)
  • Association of European Journalists, Albanian Section (AEJ)
  • Citizens Channel
  • Res Publica Center

This statement was coordinated by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Allgemein

Bosnia and Herzegovina: We demand immediate release and charges…

Bosnia and Herzegovina: We demand immediate release and charges to be dropped for journalist Nataša Miljanović Zubac

As part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) has joined forces with the Safety of Journalists Network (SJN) to call for the immediate release of journalist Nataša Miljanović Zubac and the dropping of charges against her aimed at criminalizing her reporting.

08 August 2025

Late last night, Miljanović Zubac was transferred from Trebinje to Sarajevo, accompanied by police officers and Border Police inspectors. Before the transfer, her family home was searched and her professional items and devices confiscated. She is suspected of “disclosing official secrets.”

 

The Bosnia and Herzegovina Journalists’ Association (BHJA) and the wider journalist community are appalled. Authorized officials of the Border Police, with approval from the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH, verbally requested and received a warrant from the Court of BiH to search the journalist. This was done despite her long-standing work as a responsible journalist and citizen who, voluntarily and without coercion, has for years shared information and documents on possible crimes within police structures, including the BiH Border Police.

 

These actions are a clear case of institutional pressure and intimidation. They violate Miljanović Zubac’s right to freedom of expression. This is a disproportionate show of force against a journalist’s right to work freely, safely, and with dignity — regardless of the fact that BiH’s criminal law allows questioning about how journalists obtain information on crimes committed by others.

 

The SJN and EFJ strongly condemn the attempt to criminalize Miljanović Zubac, who reports on crime, while the actual perpetrators remain free. We remind all institutions involved in this case that journalists have the right to protect their sources. They also have the right to refuse cooperation with police and judicial bodies whose actions violate journalists’ rights.

 

Miljanović Zubac has faced continuous attacks and threats since the arson attack on her car in 2022. Among the recent incidents, Miljanović Zubac was reportedly threatened  with “head chop off.” While she is being investigated for her reporting, all crimes and threats against her safety have gone unpunished. The EFJ and the SafeJournalists Network have been calling for stronger protection since the beginning of these attacks, and find it alarming to witness abuse of the journalists’ rights instead.

 

At the moment a hearing of Nataša Miljanović Zubac is in process at the Prosecutor’s Office, in the presence of a Free Media Help Line lawyer. We call for all retaliatory charges against her to be dropped immediately and for an independent investigation into her judicial harassment and the threats aimed at silencing her work.

 

*Update: Miljanović Zubac was released on 8 August after questioning at the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to her lawyer, the Prosecutor’s Office will probably submit a proposal for prohibitory measures. It has not yet made a final decision on the qualification of the crime she is suspected of.

Signed by:

  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

SafeJournalists Network

  • Croatian Journalists’ Association
  • Association of Journalists of Kosovo
  • Association of Journalists of Macedonia
  • BH Journalists Association
  • Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia
  • Trade Union of Media of Montenegro

This statement was coordinated by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

EU flags outside the European Commission Allgemein

EU: After entry into force, political will now crucial…

EU: After entry into force, political will now crucial for European Media Freedom Act success

The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) partners today welcome the historic entry into force of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), which represents a landmark achievement in ongoing efforts to safeguard media pluralism and independence across the European Union. Today, 8 August 2025, marks a new era for media freedom in the EU and comes at a crucial time for the defence of democratic values within the bloc.

8 August 2025

However, while some limited steps have been taken by national governments, overall progress is seriously lacking and many Member States have either yet to begin or are lagging behind in their obligation to align domestic legislation with the rules outlined by the EMFA, despite having had more than one year to do so.

 

As we mark the long-awaited entry into force of the Act today, our organisations jointly urge all Member States to promptly and fully implement the EMFA’s legally-binding regulations, and call on the European Commission to use all tools at its disposal to enforce them, most urgently in countries where media freedom has already been significantly eroded.

 

The entry into force of the EMFA follows its adoption in early 2024 and is the product of years of advocacy efforts and detailed negotiations, underpinned by the efforts of press and media freedom organisations, journalists and policymakers with a shared understanding of the fundamental importance of free media for democratic societies.

 

Key provisions now in force include Article 4 on surveillance, which is essential for protecting journalists from spyware and surveillance, Article 5, which ensures independence of public broadcaster financing, Article 3, which establishes the right to access a plurality of editorially independent media content, and Article 18, which aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the digital space. These and other key articles will be applicable even in the absence of national legislation, and local journalists, media workers and other actors can contest failures to implement them before national and European courts.

 

The success of the EMFA now hangs in the balance and will be dependent on political will within Member States. Moving forward, it is crucial therefore that national governments commit to significant reforms of their media legislation necessary to align with the EMFA’s standards, to ensure that the regulation does not become a dead letter but a living guarantee of press freedom that has immediate impact for journalists and media workers.

 

Regrettably, we are deeply concerned that many national governments are neither prepared nor politically willing to make the required legislative changes. This lack of commitment poses a serious risk to the EMFA’s effectiveness. To ensure its full potential, it is essential therefore that the European Commission and the European Board for Media Services rigorously monitor the EMFA implementation and use all legal tools available to act decisively to enforce its provisions whenever they are breached.

 

In the years ahead, MFRR partners – which have jointly helped drive forward this process from its inception – aim to play a key role in scrutinising this process. Through our future media freedom missions and reports, we will continue to assess the progress of national transposition and advocate for strong implementation by national governments. We commit to both holding authorities accountable and pushing the EU to enforce its rules.

 

With robust transposition across the EU, the EMFA’s unique regulatory framework can act as a vital tool for preventing and combating media capture, safeguarding independent public service broadcasting and protecting journalists from spyware and surveillance. Its full and effective implementation must now be a shared priority across Europe.

Signed by:

  • European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  • ARTICLE 19 Europe 
  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  • Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  • International Press Institute (IPI)
  • Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)

This statement was coordinated by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Allgemein

Viorica Tătaru and Andrei Captarenco, journalism “Beyond the Dniester”

Viorica Tătaru and Andrei Captarenco, journalism “Beyond the Dniester”

Viorica Tătaru and Andrei Captarenco, in their reports, describe the lives of Moldovans beyond the Dniester. In this interview, they explain the difficulties in describing daily life in a country divided between the territory controlled by Chișinău and that under the separatist government.

On paper a single and indivisible territory like all nations, the Republic of Moldova presents many internal differences and fractures. The most visible and acute, from a geographical and social perspective, is Transnistria: an unrecognized “state within a state” but de facto independent of the central power, born following an armed conflict (1992) that caused over a thousand victims.

 

Moldovan journalists Viorica Tătaru and Andrei Captarenco have been working for several years to tell the story of this region through the voices  of ordinary people who find themselves, as the title of the program broadcast on TV8 suggests, “beyond the Nistru” (Dincolo de Nistru, while the Russian title is Reka bez granic, “river without borders” – the Nistru is, in fact, the river that marks the dividing line between the Moldovan territory controlled by Chisinau and the area controlled by the “separatist” government). We interviewed them.

 

How difficult is it to tell the story of Transnistria?

For us, it’s important to understand that “beyond the Nistru” live our fellow citizens, and what we aim to do with Dincolo de Nistru is to communicate with the people who live on that territory and who survived the 1992 war (which took place in that area and, thank God, never spread to other parts of the country). But, precisely, we start from the belief that Transnistria is part of the Republic of Moldova and we do not recognize the separatist government established in the region, just as we consider the presence of Russian forces in the area illegitimate (after the collapse of the Soviet Union, a contingent of the 14th Army remained under Moscow’s control, now known as the Operational Group of Russian Troops in Transnistria – GOTR, ed.).

 

Troops along the unofficial border almost always interfere with journalists from Moldova or, more generally, anyone who wants to travel to Transnistria with a video camera and microphone to document what’s happening. We’ve been stopped countless times, effectively illegally (because there’s no law enacted by a legitimate authority prohibiting us from carrying out our work in that territory), and the attempt is always to seize the filmed footage and testimonies collected. They don’t want the world to see the reality of the place.

 

Are the people you interview generally willing to talk?

Precisely because it’s so difficult to operate in Transnistria, and because it’s subject to constant scrutiny by local authorities, most journalists don’t go into the field. But for us, it’s an essential job: you can’t simply report the news without listening to what people feel and perceive in their daily lives. And if you stop at the first hurdle, then nothing is possible, and you might as well just sit in your office or in the newsroom with your hands tied.

 

That said, the people we interact with in the region are afraid to express themselves. Sure, they talk freely about their lives and occupations, but they rarely, if ever, criticize their government or the situation they find themselves in. On the other hand, it’s not normal that theoretically, according to the unofficial rules of local authorities, an ordinary citizen can only speak to you if you, as a journalist, have accreditation or a ministerial decision. This alone is indicative of the fact that people there are like in a huge open-air prison.

 

For us, voicing such a reality is also a way to raise awareness among Moldovan public opinion and the institutions themselves, so that the issue is resolved as quickly as possible. The current government and President Maia Sandu (who is pro-European, ed.) support our work, also because our perspectives coincide, but the central state has very little influence on the decisions made in Tiraspol (the self-proclaimed capital of Transnistria, ed.). Therefore, when we have problems with the separatist authorities, we still have to act alone.

 

In general, in Moldova, what are the biggest difficulties a journalist faces?

Right now, a major problem is represented by the opposition political forces, which are “fighting” the independent press. Unfortunately, many parties are simply repeating Russian propaganda, and – we can say this from our own experience – the majority of people who participate in their demonstrations and initiatives are paid for it. They receive money to go to rallies, their bus fare is paid, etc.

 

What happens? We go there and ask questions like “Why are you here?”, “What are your goals or political beliefs?”, and we get no answers because these are people, very often the older and less educated segment of the population, who aren’t participating spontaneously. So the attitude toward independent journalists is extremely aggressive, because for the opposition parties, it’s counterproductive to expose the reality of things.

 

We suffer attacks, we receive threats… Their goal is to discourage reporters from going to their demonstrations. And it can be a winning strategy: there are many young journalists in the newsrooms who want to do their job normally; they don’t think they have to go “to war” just to cover an election campaign. For us and others, it may be different: we’ve been in Ukraine, where war has been raging for three and a half years now, and we’re not intimidated and are fighting back. It’s important for us to expose the truth.

 

Anyway, with parliamentary elections looming, we know that attacks and threats are bound to intensify, just as Russian-inspired propaganda is bound to intensify. But, both as journalists and as citizens, we feel our duty at this time is to preserve social unity as much as possible, and we are confident in the path our country has taken, toward Europe and a future with greater protection of freedom of expression.

Signed by:

  • ARTICLE 19 Europe
  • European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  • Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  • International Press Institute (IPI)
  • OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)

This statement was coordinated by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Allgemein

Georgia: Ahead of verdict, press freedom groups renew call…

Georgia: Ahead of verdict, press freedom groups renew call for Mzia Amaglobeli’s release

Ahead of the expected verdict in the case of veteran Georgian journalist Mzia Amaglobeli on Friday August 1, the undersigned press freedom, journalists, and human rights organisations jointly renew our call on Georgian Dream authorities to dismiss the criminal charge against her and to facilitate her immediate release. 

31 July 2025

Amaglobeli has been unjustly held in pre-trial detention since her arrest in January, during which time her health and eyesight have dangerously deteriorated. She has been charged under the criminal code for attacking a police officer — a charge widely regarded as excessive and politically motivated — which carries a potential sentence of up to seven years in prison. At a hearing on July 14, Amaglobeli testified about the humiliating and dehumanizing treatment she endured during her arrest on January 11 and 12.  

 

Since her arrest, Amaglobeli and her media organisations have faced smear campaigns, degrading treatment, and economic retaliation. Georgian Dream authorities have also wrongly accused her of acting on behalf of foreign powers – in what appears to be an effort to undermine her credibility as a journalist. On July 17, authorities ordered the seizure of the bank accounts of Gazeti Batumelebi and Netgazeti—another step in the Georgian Dream party’s campaign to pressure these outlets.

 

Amaglobeli has become a symbol of the resilience of Georgian media. Her arrest and prosecution comes amid a wider crackdown on media freedom in Georgia. The ruling Georgian Dream party has restricted the space for independent journalism through repressive laws, arbitrary arrests, deliberate economic pressure, and impunity for crimes against journalists. 

 

Ahead of what is expected to be Amaglobeli’s final hearing on August 1, we reiterate our call for the criminal charge against her to be dropped and for her immediate release. Our organizations, some of which were in Georgia earlier this month to monitor the previous hearing, will be closely watching developments tomorrow and hope that this discriminatory and excessive persecution of a symbol of media freedom in Georgia will come to an end.

Signed by:

  • International Press Institute (IPI) 
  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  • European Centre for Press and media Freedom (ECPMF)
  • ARTICLE 19 Europe
  • Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
  • Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  • Justice for Journalists Foundation
  • Index on Censorship
  • Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
  • Araminta
  • Media Diversity Institute Global
  • Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF)
  • IMS (International Media Support)
  • Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  • The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation
  • The Press Freedom Center at the National Press Club

This statement was coordinated by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Allgemein

Hungary: Police arrest suspect behind DDoS cyberattacks on IPI…

Hungary: Police arrest suspect behind DDoS cyberattacks on IPI and independent media websites

The International Press Institute (IPI) today welcomes news of the arrest by Hungarian law enforcement of an individual in Budapest suspected of carrying out powerful cyberattacks against the website of IPI and multiple independent news outlets in Hungary in 2023 and 2024.

22.07.2025

On 21 July, the Hungarian National Investigation Bureau’s Cybercrime Investigation Unit announced that they had raided the home of a 23-year-old man suspected of carrying out the distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks and confiscated numerous digital devices.

 

Police said the man, whose identity has not been revealed, is the cyberattacker known as Hano, who was identified as coordinating attacks on media websites in Hungary, as well as IPI. He was arrested and questioned on 9 July on suspicion of the crime of information system or data breach, according to authorities.

 

Formal charges have yet to be brought while police continue to assess digital evidence, and he has since been released from custody. Hungarian authorities added that evidence was found on the seized devices that clearly indicated the commission of the digital crimes.

 

“IPI welcomes the announcement of the arrest by Hungary’s Cybercrime Investigation Unit of the individual suspected to be the cyber attacker known as Hano,” said IPI Executive Director Scott Griffen. “We await further details on the investigation and planned charges. There are many questions here that must be answered to secure accountability. We urge authorities to clearly identify the motive behind these attacks as well as to fully and transparently investigate and determine whether any external coordination or funding was involved in these targeted attacks on independent media and civil society.”

 

IPI’s website was first hit by a DDoS attack on 1 September 2023, just days after we published a report detailing how at least 40 different media websites in Hungary had been hit by DDoS attacks, a form of cyberattack which crashes websites by overloading their servers with millions of simultaneous access requests. The majority of these attacks were directed against independent media platforms, including HVG, Telex, 444.hu, Magyar Hang, and Népszava, while pro-government media were left unscathed.

 

The attack kept IPI’s website offline for three days while our IT team fought to repel waves of attacks. An in-depth forensic analysis conducted in December 2023 by the Qurium, a non-profit based in Sweden, confirmed IPI’s initial assessment that the DDoS attack was carried out in retaliation for our work in support of independent media in Hungary.

 

Hungarian authorities said the man was identified by the Cybercrime Investigation Unit via digital traces and fake profiles. An analysis of access logs and examination of network traffic showed the perpetrator had used so-called “DDoS for hire” services and other online tools to carry out the attacks, which were executed under the name Hano – which he also used on service provider interfaces and in personal messages.

 

After it reported on the attack on IPI, the German newspaper taz was also hit by a similar attack a week later, mirroring a pattern of reprisals for media reporting on the DDoS attacks. Analysis of technical logs from the attacks on taz and IPI both show how the hacker used the nickname Hano – an acronym in Hungarian for a disorder which affects the human body. During many attacks, messages were left behind in the code, such as #HanoHatesU. The same message was left in the code of attacks on Hungarian media outlets, which continued in 2024.

 

Experts taz spoke to unofficially classified Hano as an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) – defined by the German Cybersecurity Agency as a well-trained, usually state-sponsored attacker who targets a system over a long period of time.

 

The Hungarian police report specifically mentions the attacks on IPI, which led authorities in Budapest to contact Austrian authorities due to the cross-border scope of the investigation.

 

IPI reported the case to Austrian police at the time and sent information to the Hungarian Cybercrime Investigation Unit in April 2025. IPI will be contacting Hungarian and Austrian law enforcement agencies to request further information.

 

“Cyber attacks pose a growing threat to press freedom worldwide, severely harming the public’s right to news and information. It is essential that law enforcement authorities take these attacks seriously whenever they occur and ensure full accountability for all those involved.”

In the wake of the attacks, IPI worked with Cloudflare to provide free digital security tools to a number of Hungarian media to help them defend against future DDoS attacks. If you are a media outlet in need of support in repelling DDoS attacks, IPI can provide referrals for enhanced defences free of charge. Please contact IPI for more information.

This statement was coordinated by IPI as part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Library

Georgia: Authorities seize bank accounts of Gazeti Batumelebi and…

Georgia: Authorities seize bank accounts of Gazeti Batumelebi and Netgazeti ahead of Mzia Amaghlobeli verdict

Seizure order is a new front in campaign of pressure on media outlets and their co-founder

21.07.2025

Georgian authorities’ decision to seize the bank accounts of independent media Gazeti Batumelebi and Netgazeti ahead of the verdict in the criminal trial of their co-founder Mzia Amaghlobeli is another clear front in the government’s authoritarian campaign of pressure against them, IPI said today.

 

Gazeti Batumelebi and Netgazeti are widely respected media outlets, often reporting on human rights violations and corruption, serving the public with impartial, trustworthy news since their founding 25 years ago.

 

The seizure dramatically ramps up pressure on these outlets ahead of the verdict in the criminal trial against Amaghlobeli, who has been unjustly held in pretrial detention since her arrest on January 12, during which time her health and eyesight has deteriorated.

 

The seizure order was made on 17 July citing an unpaid tax debt. According to Batumelebi, the outlet had acknowledged the debt and had been paying it back. Prior to the seizure order, the Revenue Service informed Batumelebi that it has outstanding tax debt that must be paid within five days. The organisation formally requested a structured repayment plan, which is permitted under the Georgian Tax Code.

 

However, the Revenue Service rejected this request without justification and proceeded to seize the accounts, warning that the National Bureau of Enforcement may also initiate property seizures, including the confiscation of technical equipment and its office.

 

In a statement on its website, Batumelebi condemned the action and said the real motive “appears to be an attempt to shut down the media organisation” and that it represented “direct pressure” on Amaghlobeli to make her give up ahead of the court verdict. It added that the order had been applied in a selective and discriminatory manner, pointing out that pro-government media which owe far greater sums have not received such repayment orders.

 

Amaglobeli has been charged under the criminal code with attacking a police officer – a charge widely viewed as excessive and politically motivated – which carries a sentence of up to seven years in prison.

 

Today, July 21, marks the penultimate court hearing in Amaglobeli’s case, after which a verdict is expected to be reached at a final court date, now slated for August 1.

 

The move by Georgia’s Revenue Service to place a seizure order on the online media’s bank accounts also came just days after IPI met Amaghlobeli’s colleagues from Gazeti Batumelebi and Netgazeti during a mission to Georgia by international press freedom groups to monitor a court hearing in Amaghlobeli’s case.

 

In its statement following the hearing, IPI said along with partners Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) that the proceedings had illustrated the disproportionate and politicized nature of the charges against her. The group also expressed concerns over the dehumanizing and degrading treatment Amaglobeli endured during her arrest.

 

Amaglobeli’s arrest and detention are seen by many in the journalism community in Georgia as a deliberate attempt to intimidate and silence the independent press amidst a broader crackdown on civil society and dissent.

 

“We strongly condemn what is clearly a campaign by authorities against Batumelebi and Netgazeti – first with disproportionate criminal charges against their co-founder and now by seizing their bank accounts”, Amy Brouillette, IPI Director of Advocacy, said. “The IPI global network stands by Batumelebi and Netgazeti and Mzia Amaglobeli and calls on authorities to cease its campaign of harassment.”

 

The Media Development Investment Fund has launched a fundraiser to support Amaghlobeli’s fight for freedom. You can donate via the GoFundMe page here.

This statement was coordinated by IPI as part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries.

Event

Satire on trial: The case of Leman and the…

Satire on trial: 

The case of Leman and the shrinking space for media in Turkey

28 July, 11:00 CET.

The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) invites you to a timely and urgent discussion on the escalating crackdown against Leman, one of Turkey’s most prominent satirical magazines, and what this case reveals about the broader assault on media freedom, artistic expression, and independent journalism in Turkey.

Following the publication of a cartoon in its June 26 issue, Leman has faced an intense and coordinated campaign of judicial, economic, and physical repression. The cartoon, which depicted two men named Muhammad and Moses greeting each other above a bombed city, was meant as a critique of Israeli attacks on Gaza, but was swiftly condemned by political and religious figures as offensive. Violent protests, social media outrage, and state-led legal action quickly followed.

By early July, four Leman staff members had been arrested, including the magazine’s editor-in-chief, cartoonist, and graphic designer, facing charges of “inciting hatred” and “insulting religious values.” A financial investigation was launched, the June 26 issue was confiscated, and Leman’s website was banned nationwide.

This alarming episode represents yet another attack on freedom of expression in Turkey, part of a wider pattern of censorship and judicial harassment.

Speakers

Sinan Gökçen

Programme Officer at Civil Rights Defenders, journalist

Zehra Ömeroğlu

Cartoonist and Former Contributor to Leman Magazine for Over a Decade

Terry Anderson

Executive Director at Cartoonists Rights Network International

Emre İlkan Saklıca

Turkey Programme Coordinator at the International Press Institute (IPI)

Moderator

Gürkan Özturan

Monitoring Officer, European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)